Kerry continues job as chief salesman of Iran deal

John Kerry, Ernest Moniz
Secretary of State John Kerry, left, testifies along with Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, second from left, and Secretary of Treasury Jack Lew at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, in Washington, Thursday, July 23, 2015, to review the Iran nuclear agreement. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Fresh from a spirited defense of the Iranian nuclear deal on Capitol Hill, Secretary of State John Kerry is selling the accord to top U.S. foreign policy leaders while telling lawmakers that if they don’t back the deal, Washington will have “squandered the best chance” it has to peacefully solve the nuclear standoff with Tehran.

Kerry is to speak about the deal on Friday at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City and then meet with leaders from the American Jewish Committee and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. Some Jewish groups have vehemently opposed the deal with Iran, which has pledged to destroy Israel.

Kerry has been front-and-center of the Obama administration’s campaign to sell the deal to skeptical lawmakers. Congress has started a 60-day review of the agreement, which lifts economic sanctions against Iran if it curbs its nuclear program’s capacity to build a nuclear weapon.

Slowly, a number of congressional Democrats have lined up behind the deal.

Rep. Sam Farr, D-Calif., said he supports the agreement and described the upcoming vote in Congress as a “vote on something that will avoid war.”

At a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Thursday, Kerry said that it is “fantasy plain and simple” to claim that President Barack Obama failed to insist on enough restraints on Iran’s nuclear program before agreeing to lift economic sanctions long in place.

“So what’s your plan? … Totally go to war?” he challenged lawmakers who want to torpedo the deal.

“If the U.S., after laboriously negotiating this multilateral agreement with five other partners, were to walk away from those partners, we’re on our own,” Kerry said. “Our partners will not walk away with us. Instead, they will walk away from the tough multilateral sanctions regime that they’ve helped to put in place, and we will have squandered the best chance we have to solve this problem through peaceful means.”

Republicans were unpersuaded.

“I believe that you have crossed a new threshold in U.S. foreign policy where now it is the policy of the United States to enable a state-sponsor of terror to obtain an industrialized nuclear development program,” said the committee chairman, Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.

Given the political calculus, the Senate hearing wasn’t so much an attempt by Kerry to persuade Republicans to support the plan as it was an opportunity to reassure Democrats.

And after four days of reading and mulling the more than 150-page agreement the U.S. and five other world powers negotiated with Iran, more Democrats are poised to publicly embrace it, according to a Democratic aide. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to discuss lawmakers’ decisions until they are formally announced.

With the exception of Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey, Democrats questioned administration officials far more gently than the Republicans, suggesting they will side with Obama on a deal he has called historic.

“Negotiators got an awful lot, particularly on the nuclear front,” said Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin, the ranking Democrat on the committee who has not decided whether to support the deal.

Later, Kerry met with House Democrats.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, who supports the deal, said some lawmakers have begun thinking that Iran won’t have as much as they feared to possibly use for activities that have destabilized the Middle East, such as supporting Shia militias in Iraq, Houthi rebels in Yemen and the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew told the committee that the U.S. estimates that after sanctions on Iran are eased “Iran will only be able to freely access” about $50 billion of the $100 billion it has in foreign reserves.

“I think people feel like there won’t suddenly be any sort of big windfall going to supporting terrorist organizations,” said Schakowsky. But she added, “They’re not promising that none of it would go to nefarious groups.”

KRQE.com provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Users who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s